There was an article in the ET (http://www.economictimes.com)
today in the "Big Bucks" section which said that studies have
shown that 'Beta' might not be the best way to relate risk/return.
Of course there could be many such contradicting studies/reports,
but I thought I'd let everyone know :)
I haven't been able to find the URL for this on the net. So, in
case anyone does find it, please let me know.